# Radiometric dating speed of light

Exponential curves could not reproduce the observed rates of change at the different dates or the observed values. Power curves, polynomials, logarithmic and hyperbolic functions were all tried with lack of success.

There was only one curve tried which fitted the data points exactly and reproduced all of the observed features.

The basic postulate of this article is that **light** has slowed down exponentially since the time of Creation.

This thought is radical and at first looks outside of confirmation.

This conclusion raises the obvious difficulty as to how one verifies a process which has occurred in the past but is not occurring in the present.

To answer this, we would point out that the curve is solely dependent on actual dependent on actual observations and refer to Appendix 3 for confirmatory statistical treatment of this data. The origin of the curve is virtually asymptotic, but a very good estimate of the actual initial value is given by the curve at one to 1.5 days from its origin.

Surely such **light** would take millions of years to reach us.” The question is a valid one and several types of answers have been proposed to it in the past with only limited success.For example, if we take 6,000 years as being the complete range of the curve, these 6,000 years take up the 90 degrees of the Log sine scale so the transformation to obtain (T) in degrees is T = (t/l) x (90/6000): that is T = 0.015 t.Since the Flinders University computer was working in radians, the transformation was T = zt where z = 11/12000 = 0.261799387799 x (1/10), which gives T in radians.The decay curve is quite sensitive to its date of origin.If this is set too early, the curve comes in below the early clusters of points.